{"id":29861,"date":"2022-04-12T13:02:01","date_gmt":"2022-04-12T12:02:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/?post_type=blog&#038;p=29861"},"modified":"2022-07-19T09:31:08","modified_gmt":"2022-07-19T09:31:08","slug":"ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor","status":"publish","type":"blog","link":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/","title":{"rendered":"UE critic\u0103 statele membre pentru c\u0103 nu protejeaz\u0103 avertizorii\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 de \u021b\u0103ri din cele 27 de state membre ale UE pentru nerespectarea termenelor stabilite \u00een Directiva UE pentru avertizarea de integritate. Acest lucru demonstreaz\u0103 un angajament destul de slab de a proteja de represalii martorii unei conduite incorecte.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-portugalia-\u0219i-suedia-primesc-notificari-oficiale-pentru-intarzieri\">Portugalia \u0219i Suedia primesc notific\u0103ri oficiale pentru \u00eent\u00e2rzieri&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen fiecare lun\u0103, Comisia European\u0103 ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 \u00een justi\u021bie statele membre pentru nerespectarea obliga\u021biilor care le revin conform legisla\u021biei UE. Deciziile privind \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dreptului comunitar urm\u0103resc s\u0103 asigure aplicarea corect\u0103 a dreptului UE, at\u00e2t \u00een beneficiul persoanelor fizice, c\u00e2t \u0219i al companiilor.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dac\u0103 \u021b\u0103rile nu respect\u0103 legea, poate fi emis\u0103 o notificare oficial\u0103. Acesta este primul pas dintr-un proces \u00een cinci etape care poate avea ca rezultat amendarea unei \u021b\u0103ri \u0219i obligarea de a respecta legea. \u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>La 9 februarie, Comisia a trimis notific\u0103ri oficiale Portugaliei \u0219i Suediei pentru decizia de a am\u00e2na data de punere \u00een aplicare a legilor na\u021bionale privind protec\u021bia avertizorilor. \u00cen Portugalia, legea na\u021bional\u0103 va intra \u00een vigoare la 19 iunie 2022, la 180 de zile de la publicare. \u00cen Suedia, punerea \u00een aplicare a anumitor cerin\u021be a fost am\u00e2nat\u0103 p\u00e2n\u0103 la 17 iulie 2022.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ambele \u021b\u0103ri au respectat termenul limit\u0103 de 17 decembrie 2021 pentru transpunerea directivei UE \u00een legisla\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-24-de-state-membre-nu-reu\u0219esc-sa-protejeze-inca-avertizorii\">24 de state membre nu reu\u0219esc s\u0103 protejeze \u00eenc\u0103 avertizorii\u00a0<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Directiva UE pentru o mai bun\u0103 protec\u021bie a avertizorilor a fost adoptat\u0103 cu peste doi ani \u00een urm\u0103, \u00een octombrie 2019. Termenul stabilit pentru transpunerea directivei \u00een legisla\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103 a fost 17 decembrie 2021. Mai mult de doi ani mai t\u00e2rziu, majoritatea \u021b\u0103rilor UE \u00eenc\u0103 nu dispun de o legisla\u021bie na\u021bional\u0103 cuprinz\u0103toare privind avertizorii.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen ianuarie 2022, Comisia European\u0103 a trimis notific\u0103ri oficiale p\u00e2n\u0103 la 24 de \u021b\u0103ri UE, toate acestea dep\u0103\u0219ind termenul limit\u0103 din decembrie. Danemarca \u0219i Lituania au adoptat noi legi privind avertizorii, \u00eens\u0103 acestea nu au intrat \u00een vigoare \u00eenainte de termenul limit\u0103. De atunci, Cipru, Fran\u021ba, Letonia \u0219i Italia au adoptat \u0219i noi legi.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen mod ironic, doar Malta, care este considerat\u0103 a avea unul dintre cele mai slabe sisteme de protec\u021bie a avertizorilor din Europa, a reu\u0219it pe deplin s\u0103 respecte Directiva UE. Malta a adoptat o nou\u0103 lege a avertizorilor pe 16 noiembrie \u0219i a intrat \u00een vigoare pe 17 decembrie (\u00eempreun\u0103 cu directiva UE). Totu\u0219i, legea a fost criticat\u0103 pentru lipsa consult\u0103rii \u0219i a fost luat\u0103 \u00een grab\u0103.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-lipsa-de-protec\u021bie-a-avertizorilor-din-statele-membre-ue-are-consecin\u021be\">Lipsa de protec\u021bie a avertizorilor din statele membre UE are consecin\u021be&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u00e2n\u0103 acum, Directiva UE privind o mai bun\u0103 protec\u021bie a avertizorilor nu se desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 exact a\u0219a cum s-a sperat. Pu\u021binele legi na\u021bionale privind avertizorii deja \u00een vigoare au fost criticate pentru c\u0103 nu au inclus detalii despre cum s\u0103-i protejeze pe angaja\u021bi de represalii sau s\u0103-i compenseze pentru salariile pierdute \u0219i alte consecin\u021be negative. \u00cen Danemarca, de exemplu, legea con\u021bine criterii extrem de subiective, cum ar fi dezv\u0103luirea \u201enecesar\u0103\u201d, care ar putea pune probleme martorilor.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 procesele din toate \u021b\u0103rile sunt destul de unice, este necesar\u0103 \u00eenv\u0103\u021barea \u0219i evaluarea continu\u0103 pentru ca aceste legi s\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i ating\u0103 poten\u021bialul. R\u0103m\u00e2ne \u00eentrebarea dac\u0103 \u021b\u0103rile membre UE vor adopta sau nu o abordare serioas\u0103 \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te protec\u021bia avertizorilor. Am\u00e2narea legisla\u021biei va permite s\u0103 continue faptele gre\u0219ite care amenin\u021b\u0103 vie\u021bi, planeta noastr\u0103 sau economia, totul pentru c\u0103 poten\u021bialilor denun\u021b\u0103tori le este prea fric\u0103 s\u0103 se pronun\u021be.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Citi\u021bi mai multe: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/in-ce-punct-se-afla-statele-europene-in-ceea-ce-priveste-adoptarea-directivei-ue-whistleblowing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Unde sunt \u021b\u0103rile \u00een adoptarea Directivei UE privind avertismentele<\/a>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-\"><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Vrei s\u0103 afli mai multe despre avertizarea de integritate \u0219i canalele sigure? Cite\u0219te mai multe despre legea avertizorilor de integritate a UE <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/directiva-ue-pentru-avertizarea-de-integritate\/\">aici<\/a> \u0219i pe <a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?qid=1579618900833&amp;uri=CELEX:32019L1937\">EUR-Lex<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cau\u021bi un canal de avertizare de integritate sigur? Cite\u0219te mai multe<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/produs\/\"> aici<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vrei s\u0103 discut\u0103m mai multe despre un canal de avertizare de integritate sigur pentru organiza\u021bia ta?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/contacteaza-ne\/\">Contacteaz\u0103-ne<\/a> sau <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/solicita-una-demo\/\">cere un Demo gratis<\/a>!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 de \u021b\u0103ri din cele 27 de state membre ale UE pentru nerespectarea termenelor stabilite \u00een Directiva UE pentru avertizarea de integritate. Acest lucru demonstreaz\u0103 un angajament destul de slab de a proteja de represalii martorii unei conduite incorecte.\u00a0 Portugalia \u0219i Suedia primesc notific\u0103ri oficiale pentru \u00eent\u00e2rzieri&nbsp; \u00cen fiecare lun\u0103, Comisia European\u0103 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":29830,"template":"","format":"standard","blog-category":[211],"class_list":["post-29861","blog","type-blog","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","blog-category-articole"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.3 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>UE critic\u0103 statele care nu iau m\u0103suri pentru protec\u021bia avertizorilor<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 din 27 de state membre pentru c\u0103 nu ofer\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 protec\u021bie avertizorilor conform Directivei UE.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"UE critic\u0103 statele membre pentru c\u0103 nu protejeaz\u0103 avertizorii\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 din 27 de state membre pentru c\u0103 nu ofer\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 protec\u021bie avertizorilor conform Directivei UE.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Whistlelink\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/whistlelink\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-19T09:31:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EU-scolds-member-states.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"628\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/\",\"name\":\"UE critic\u0103 statele care nu iau m\u0103suri pentru protec\u021bia avertizorilor\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/EU-scolds-member-states.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-12T12:02:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-19T09:31:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 din 27 de state membre pentru c\u0103 nu ofer\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 protec\u021bie avertizorilor conform Directivei UE.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/EU-scolds-member-states.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/EU-scolds-member-states.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":628,\"caption\":\"protejat avertizorii\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Blog\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"UE critic\u0103 statele membre pentru c\u0103 nu protejeaz\u0103 avertizorii\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/\",\"name\":\"Whistlelink\",\"description\":\"A trusted provider of secure whistleblowing solutions.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Whistlelink\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/WhistlelinkLogoEmail.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/WhistlelinkLogoEmail.png\",\"width\":704,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Whistlelink\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.whistlelink.com\\\/ro\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/whistlelink\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/whistlelink\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/vimeo.com\\\/user152082481\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UE critic\u0103 statele care nu iau m\u0103suri pentru protec\u021bia avertizorilor","description":"Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 din 27 de state membre pentru c\u0103 nu ofer\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 protec\u021bie avertizorilor conform Directivei UE.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"UE critic\u0103 statele membre pentru c\u0103 nu protejeaz\u0103 avertizorii\u00a0","og_description":"Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 din 27 de state membre pentru c\u0103 nu ofer\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 protec\u021bie avertizorilor conform Directivei UE.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/","og_site_name":"Whistlelink","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/whistlelink\/","article_modified_time":"2022-07-19T09:31:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":628,"url":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EU-scolds-member-states.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Timp estimat pentru citire":"3 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/","url":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/","name":"UE critic\u0103 statele care nu iau m\u0103suri pentru protec\u021bia avertizorilor","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EU-scolds-member-states.png","datePublished":"2022-04-12T12:02:01+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-19T09:31:08+00:00","description":"Comisia European\u0103 critic\u0103 26 din 27 de state membre pentru c\u0103 nu ofer\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 protec\u021bie avertizorilor conform Directivei UE.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EU-scolds-member-states.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EU-scolds-member-states.png","width":1200,"height":628,"caption":"protejat avertizorii"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/ue-critica-statele-membre-pentru-ca-protectia-avertizorilor\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"UE critic\u0103 statele membre pentru c\u0103 nu protejeaz\u0103 avertizorii\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/","name":"Whistlelink","description":"A trusted provider of secure whistleblowing solutions.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/#organization","name":"Whistlelink","url":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/WhistlelinkLogoEmail.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/WhistlelinkLogoEmail.png","width":704,"height":75,"caption":"Whistlelink"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/whistlelink\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/whistlelink\/","https:\/\/vimeo.com\/user152082481"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog\/29861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/blog"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog\/29861\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29830"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"blog-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.whistlelink.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog-category?post=29861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}