Get useful tips, learn best practices and read the latest newsThe Whistlelink Blog

3 whistleblowing system myths

3 whistleblowing system myths.
Organisations are often skeptical about encouraging whistleblowing. Believing a whistleblowing system will impact negatively on its reputation or culture, or they’ll receive an abundance of complaints or unfounded reports from dissatisfied employees or associates.

Fortunately, these fears are misguided.

Below, we explore these three common myths or concerns about whistleblowing systems.

  1. It will damage our reputation
  2. We’ll drown in reports
  3. It will create a negative culture

Myth 1: Whistleblowing damages an organisation’s reputation

This could be true if a whistleblower goes directly to the media or another external outlet. The damage could be done before it’s too late to react. Having an internal reporting system and encouraging employees to use it can prevent them from disclosing information externally.

Providing reports are handled correctly, it gives a company the opportunity to identify and address issues at an early stage. Subsequently reducing potential risks and damage to its reputation.

Reading tip > 6 benefits of whistleblowing organisations cannot afford to ignore

Myth 2: Organisations will drown in reports when they have a whistleblowing system

Many companies believe that simply having a whistleblowing system will mean they’re inundated with false (and true!) reports because people will report something for the sake of it.

This isn’t necessarily the case and it isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

It has been shown that although some reports may be made on malicious grounds, most whistleblowers are actually trying to do what is right.

Receiving a high quantity of whistleblower reports may appear to indicate a lot of issues to address. But it can actually indicate that an organisation has good governance practices and a healthy working culture, where employees feel comfortable to speak-up.

More reports may mean more issues. But if they are issues to be resolved then a company wants to know about them. Knowing about them is the only way to stop them, and prevent any seriously damaging financial or reputational harm.

A study by Harvard Business Review found that organisations with a higher number of whistleblowing reports actually have fewer lawsuits, smaller fees from legal settlements, and fewer fines.

Receiving few reports may feel good, because it indicates that everything is working well. But it in fact may indicate that a whistleblowing policy is not working as intended.

Employees may not trust the whistleblowing channels in place. Or, they simply do not know where to turn to report misconduct in the workplace. It is therefore important to have a clear and transparent whistleblowing policy that is well communicated to employees. It should detail how to use the reporting system, that reports are anonymous, and how cases will be handled.

Reading tip > How to encourage employees to report misconduct

Myth 3: Whistleblowing systems create a negative culture

Organisations worry that introducing a whistleblowing system could indicate that it doesn’t trust its workforce. Or maybe that it wants to encourage its employees to snitch on each other.  Then the whistleblower is concerned about bullying and retaliation. Signs of a negative culture.

Actually, when done well, it’s quite the opposite.

An organisation that shows it actively encourages employees to report concerns and supports them if they do so, gains more trust. Consequently achieving an open and honest culture. Creating better working relationships and loyal employees, who are more likely to make reports using internal rather than external channels.

This also promotes a company’s reputation as it sends strong signals that a company takes ethical matters seriously and is prepared to tackle any irregularities.

A positive culture with an ethical approach can make an organisation more attractive to customers, investors or employees. In fact, millennials are more concerned about buying from or working for corporations that have high ethical standards than those that don’t.

An anonymous reporting system is a good indication of high ethical standards. This is because it implies the organisation has no intention of retaliating against a whistleblower. Instead, it shows that the company wants to know about any unethical or illegal activity taking place so that it can do something about it to put it right.

Are you feeling more confident that a whistleblowing system is a good idea for you? Contact us or book a free demo and we’ll take you through implementing a system and the best fit for your organisation.

Would you like to learn more about a whistleblowing service and safe internal reporting channels? Read more about the EU Whistleblowing Directive here and at EUR-Lex.

Are you looking for a safe and secure whistleblowing solution? Read more here.

If you have any thoughts about this article or would like to know more about Whistlelink, we’d love to hear from you.

Liked this article?
Spread the word

The EU Whistleblowing Directive explained

Philippa Johnsson,

Try Whistlelink for free

Test our whistleblowing system free for a month

The new whistleblowing law

WHISTLELINK BLOGWhat to read next...​

Internal investigation of alleged corporate misconduct
Partner interview with Alexandra Mota Gomes, Partner at Antas da Cunha, Portugal
Whistleblowing in transport and logistics  


Get in touch

Our team is ready to answer your questions. Find the answer by visiting our support centre, or fill out the form below and we'll be in touch as soon as possible. Or simply give us a call!

Talk with Territory Manager
Annelie Demred

0046 (0)706 83 82 88